Minutes:
The licensing officer presented their report. Members had no questions for the licensing officer.
The applicant and their representative addressed the sub-committee. Members had questions for the applicant and their representative.
The licensing responsible authority officer addressed the sub-committee. Members had questions for the licensing responsible authority officer.
The environmental protection officer addressed the sub-committee. Members had questions for the environmental protection officer.
All parties were given up to five minutes for summing up.
The meeting adjourned at 2.08pm for the sub-committee to consider its decision.
The meeting reconvened at 2.56pm and the chair advised everyone of the decision.
RESOLVED:
That the application made by Jose Rafael Ferreira Minaya for a premises licence under the Licensing Act 2003 in respect of the premises known asMalibu Restaurant Bar, 229 Old Kent Road, London, SE1 5LU be granted as follows:
Live Music (indoors)
|
Sunday to Thursday from 11:00 to 23:00, Friday and Saturday from 11:00 to 00:00 |
|
|
Recorded music (indoors)
|
Sunday to Thursday from 10:00 to 23:30, Friday and Saturday from 10:00 to 00:30 |
|
|
Late night refreshment (indoors)
|
Sunday to Thursday from 23:00 to 23:30, Friday and Saturday from 23:00 to 00:30 |
|
|
Supply of Alcohol (On Sales)
|
Sunday to Thursday from 11:00 to 23:30, Friday and Saturday from 11:00 to 00:30
|
|
|
Opening hours |
Sunday to Thursday from 08:00 to 00:00, Friday and Saturday from 08:00 to 01:00 |
|
|
Conditions
The operation of the premises under the licence shall be subject to relevant mandatory conditions, conditions derived from the operating schedule highlighted in parts E, F, I, J, K, L, and M of the application form and the conditions agreed with the Metropolitan Police Service and trading standards through the conciliation process and the conditions imposed by the sub-committee.
Sub-committee conditions
1. When this licence is used to provide licensable activities and the licence summary is displayed on the premises, the licence summary of any other premises licence will not be displayed at the same time.
2. That only management staff shall have access to any amplification equipment at the premises, and only management staff shall be permitted to change any control settings on said equipment.
3. That suitable external containers for customer cigarette butts shall be provided at all times that the premises are in use. Such containers shall be emptied regularly to ensure that they can be used at all times that the premises are in use, and so that they do not overflow and cause cigarette butt litter in the vicinity.
4.
That clearly legible signage stating a dedicated
contact telephone number for the premises shall be prominently
displayed. The signage shall state to the effect that the
phone number shown can be used to contact the premises in respect
of any complaints regarding the operation of the premises. Such
signage shall be kept free from obstructions at all
times.
The sub-committee adopted all the conditions put forward by the environmental protection team:
5. That patrons shall not be permitted to use any external area of the premises after 22:00 on any day until the premises reopens the following day, apart from for access and egress and for smoking (no more than 5 persons shall be allowed to use the external area to smoke at any one time after 22:00)
6. That amplified music, song or speech shall not be broadcast in external areas at any time.
7. That all external doors and doors to noise lobbies used by patrons to enter the premises shall be kept closed except for access and egress and shall have acoustic seals, brushes and self-closers (in accordance with BS 6459 Pt. 1 1984) fitted to those doors.
8. That clearly legible signage will be prominently displayed at all patron exits, where it can easily be seen and read, requesting that patrons leave the premises in a quiet and orderly manner that is respectful to neighbours.
9.
That a comprehensive dispersal policy shall be
produced and implemented at the premises, with all staff trained on
the most recent iteration of the policy. A record of staff
training on the dispersal policy shall be kept at the premises and
a copy of the policy and training records be made available to the
council or police on request.
10. That suitably qualified or experienced persons shall be employed at all times whilst licensable activity is being provided, and shall take all reasonable steps to ensure that patrons do not cause a nuisance in the vicinity of the premises.
11. That any background music played shall remain at a volume that permits normal conversation and the volume control of any music shall be behind the bar/counter and in the full control of staff at all times.
12. That a sound limiting device shall be installed, set and maintained, to control maximum levels of amplified sound inside the premises so as to ensure entertainment noise from the premises does not cause a public nuisance in the vicinity of the premises, and in particular is not audible inside any nearby noise sensitive premises.
13. That all audio and musical equipment used in the premises, permitted under the Licensing Act 2003 or the Live Music Act 2012, shall be played through the installed sound limiting device.
14. That all speakers for the broadcast of sound within the premises shall be isolated from the structure of the premises by anti-vibration mountings or mats.
15. That the premises management shall regularly monitor outside the premises to ensure that the volume and bass levels of any licensed entertainment is kept at a level that does not cause disturbance at the closest or most exposed noise-sensitive facade to ensure the prevention of public nuisance.
Conciliated conditions with trading standards
16. 4AA – That the premises shall operate an age check 'Challenge 25' policy whereby customers purchasing alcohol who look or appear to be under 25 years of age will be asked for an approved form of proof of age to verify their age. Approved forms shall include a driving licence, passport or a PASS approved proof of age card such as the Southwark Proof of Age (SPA) card.
17. 4AB – That all staff involved in the sale of alcohol shall be trained in the age check 'Challenge 25' policy. A record of their training, including the dates that each member of staff is trained, shall be available for inspection at the premises on request by the Council's authorised officers or the Police.
18. 4AC – That Age check or 'Challenge 25' signage shall be displayed at entrances to the premises, areas where alcohol is displayed for sale and at points of sale to inform customers that an age check 'Challenge 25' policy applies and proof of age may be required.
19. 4AI – That a register of refused sales of alcohol shall be maintained in order to demonstrate effective operation of the policy. The register shall be available for inspection at the premises on request by Council authorised officers or the Police.
Conciliated conditions with the Metropolitan Police Service
20. That a digital CCTV system shall be installed at the premises, shall be maintained in full working order and shall be continually recording at all times that the premises are in use. The CCTV system must be capable of capturing a clear facial image of every person who enters the premises in all lighting conditions. The CCTV system shall be correctly time and date stamped at all times. The CCTV system shall cover all interior and exterior areas of the premises, including the frontage of the premises, and shall collect clearly defined / focused footage. That all CCTV footage shall be kept for a period of thirty one (31) days and shall be made immediately available to Police and responsible authority officers on request.
21. That a member of staff shall be on duty at all times that the premises are in use, who is trained in the use of the CCTV system and who is able to view, and download to a removable storage device, CCTV footage at the immediate request of Police and responsible authority officers.
22. That clearly legible signage shall be prominently displayed where it can easily be seen and read by customers advising to the effect that CCTV is in operation at the premises. The signage shall be kept free from obstructions at all times.
23. That all relevant staff shall be trained in their responsibilities under the Licensing Act 2003, the promotion of the licensing objectives and the terms and conditions of this licence. Records pertaining to such training (‘the staff training logs’) shall be kept at the premises, shall be updated every six months and shall be made immediately available to responsible authority officers on request. The training logs shall include the trainee’s name (in block capitals), the trainer’s name (in block capitals), the date(s) of training and a declaration that the training has been received and understood by the trainee. If the staff training logs are a paper hardcopy then the signature of the trainee, the signature of the trainer shall be included. That all digital records of training and/or logs shall be made immediately available to police and responsible authority officers on request.
24. That clearly legible signs shall be prominently displayed where they can easily be seen and read by customers at all exits from the premises, requesting that:
a) Customers leave the premises and area in a quiet and orderly manner.
b) Customers do not consume alcoholic drinks bought at the premises in the vicinity of the premises. Such signs shall be maintained free from obstruction when the premises are in use in accordance with this licence.
25. That the supply of alcohol on the premises shall be to a person seated taking a substantial hot table meal there and for consumption by such a person as ancillary to their meal.
26. That an incident book/incident recording system shall be kept at the premises to record details of any of the following occurrences at the premises:
i. Instances of anti-social or disorderly behaviour or violence
ii. Calls to the police or fire brigade
iii. Abuse of staff and/or customers
iv. Ejections of people from the premises
v. Visits to the premises by the local authority, police or fire brigade
vi. Refused sales of alcohol
vii. Any malfunction in respect of the CCTV system
viii. Any other relevant incidents.
The incident book/incident recording system shall record the time, date, location, and description of each incident as well as the printed name of the person reporting the incident and any action taken in respect of the incident. The incident book/incident recording system shall be available and accessible at the premises at all times that the premises are in use in accordance with this licence and shall be made available immediately to police and responsible authority officers upon request. A record of the preceding 12 months' incidents shall be available at the premises at any time. That all digital records of training and/or logs shall be made immediately available to police and responsible authority officers on request.
27. That if a Pubwatch scheme exists in respect of the local area, then the licensee / management will join and participate in the Pubwatch scheme (details can be obtained from Southwark Police Licensing and night time economy team).
28. That the premises must have a welfare and vulnerability policy and all staff must receive this training. All new staff must receive this training before starting their role and all staff must have refresher training every 12 months. All training must be recorded and these records must be available on immediate request by responsible authority officers. That all digital records of training and/or logs shall be made immediately available to police and responsible authority officers on request.
29. That the venue shall support “Ask for Angela” or another similar safety initiative and posters shall be displayed on the premises. All staff shall be trained in “Ask Angela” or a similar safety initiative and a record of this training shall be kept on the premises and made available for inspection immediately to responsible authority officers upon request. That all Digital records of training and/or logs shall be made immediately available to Police and responsible authority officers on request.
30. That customers shall use no outside area other than those who temporarily leave the premises to smoke with no more than five (5) people permitted to smoke at one any time. The Staff shall monitor the area and ensure patrons do not not obstruct the highway or cause any disturbance to their neighbours.
31. That a dispersal policy to assist with patrons leaving the premises in an orderly and safe manner shall be devised and maintained regarding the premises. A copy of the dispersal policy shall be accessible at the premises at all times that the premises are in operation. The policy should include (but not necessarily be limited to) the following:
i. Details as to how customer / staff egress at the premises shall be managed to minimise causing nuisance.
ii. Details of public transport in the vicinity and how customers will be advised in respect of it.
iii. Details of the management of taxis to and from the premises.
iv. Details of the management of any 'winding down' period at the premises.
v. Details of the use of security and stewarding in respect of managing customer dispersal from the premises.
vi. Details of road safety in respect of customers leaving the premises.
vii. Details of the management of ejections from the premises.
viii. Details as to how any physical altercations at the premises are to be managed
ix. Details of how refuse / waste in the local vicinity arising through the operation of the premises will be cleared up (e.g. flyer clean up, post event clean up).
32. That there shall be no removal of glassware by patrons from the premises at any time.
33. That there shall be no DJ led events at the venue.
Reasons
The licensing sub-committee convened to consider an application for a new premises licence in respect of the premises known as Malibu Restaurant Bar, 229 Old Kent Road, London SE1 5LU.
The licensing sub-committee heard from the licensing officer who outlined the nature of the application and the remaining objections by the environmental protection team (EPT) and the licensing unit. She confirmed that there were no residents objecting and that the premises was not situated in a community impact area (CIA).
She stated, the Metropolitan Police Service “the police” and trading standards had conciliated with the applicant after the applicant agreed to a number of conditions put forward by each responsible authority.
The officer went on to state, there is an existing premises licence in respect of the premises made by another but, that licence had been suspended for non-payment of fees. She confirmed that if the outstanding fees were to be paid against that licence, it would be re-instated.
The licensing sub-committee heard from the applicant. He stated that the business had opened a few months ago and that drinks are primarily served with meals. He confirmed that it was not a nightclub and there was no dancefloor. He described the premises layout consisting of tables and chairs and said he did not provide live music as the premises is quite small.
He accepted that there had been issues with noise nuisance when the business first opened but, those issues had now been resolved. He said that he had a good relationship with his neighbours and the responsible authorities and had run the restaurant using temporary event notices (TENs) during which, the premises had conducted itself appropriately.
In respect of his ambition for the business, he stated that he would like to give his customers the opportunity to have a glass of wine or beer with their meal and that he wanted people to be able to enjoy Spanish cuisine. He went on to say that the premises provided a place for families to get together opining that, it is a community space. He noted neighbouring establishments were opened until the early hours of the morning and wanted parity.
In answer to the committee’s questions, he said that he was not aware of a licence on the premises and that the business had leased the premises from the owner who lived in the flat above it. He said he had leased the premises in September 2023, renovated the building, had no contact with and did not know the previous licensee.
He said that he mainly serves drinks with a substantial table meal however, after 23.00 some people may just want a drink. He said that the main focus would be to serve alcohol with a drink and all patrons will be seated at a table where they would be served by waiting staff. He confirmed that there was a small outside terraced area attached to the premises but that terraced area was not being utilised by the business.
In relation to single use plastics, the applicant explained that after 23.00 he would use single use plastics. He said that the police had insisted when operating under a TEN that the premises use plastic crockery and cups and he followed that advice. He confirmed that the plastics used in the premises were single use. He then went on to agree that he could use re-usable plastics after 23.00.
In response questions regarding advertisements, he stated his patrons would normally walk or use public transport to attend the premises. He agreed that he would emphasise the use of public transport and inform patrons of the various public transport links in future advertising.
The licensing sub-committee heard from the licensing responsible authority officer. The officer stated that the hours applied for were outside of Southwark’s statement of licensing policy. He opined that the new licence should mirror the hours set out in the suspended licence and suggested the conditions set out in the representations should be applied to the new licence.
The committee noted that there was a significant number of conditions which were over protective and perhaps, outside the jurisdiction of the licensing unit. The committee asked if there was a particular reasons for those conditions in relation to this particular premises. The officer stated the conditions were standard and went on to say it would be a matter for the committee as to whether it wished to adopt them.
The licensing sub-committee heard from an officer from the EPT. He pointed out that there had been noise nuisance shortly after the premises had opened and a member of the nuisance team attended the premises. At that time the premises was operating under a TEN. That officer determined that there was a statutory noise nuisance emanating from the premises which subsequently led to an abatement notice being served. He confirmed that following the abatement notice being served; the police issued a closure notice after alcohol was being served without a licence or TEN in place. Due to the breaches they objected to a late TEN which led to a counter notice being served.
Following talks with the applicant, EPT decided to give the applicant a chance and stated they would not object to a TEN if they adhered to conditions going forward. Those conditions form part of the EPT representations. The officer stated that since those conditions had been adopted there had been no further complaint from the premises whilst it operated under TENs
The officer went on to state should the committee grant a licence, all 11 conditions should be applied to the licence.
The applicant in answer to questions, confirmed that there was not a sound limiter in place as there isn’t a sound system at the premises. He said music is played through the television. He said that there are no plans to get a sound system as the music provided through a TV channel was sufficient for background music for the restaurant.
In summing up all parties reiterated or stood by their/its positions.
After hearing all the parties, the licensing sub-committee retired to deliberate the application. It considered all the conditions put forward by the responsible authorities.
On considering the conditions put forward by the police it noted that it had a condition relating to off-sales. As the application did not relate to off-sales, the committee deleted that condition.
The committee were taken aback by the applicant’s statement that the police had encouraged and advised the use of single use plastics in place of crockery and glassware. The committee saw no good reason a why a restaurant would be advised to not use crockery and glassware and, felt that this approach was the contrary to the council’s approach taken in its climate change strategy. The committee was shocked and disappointed that this contrary approach was being adopted by the premises. The committee went on to recommend that the applicant use crockery and glassware at all times but, where this is not possible, use its best endeavours not to use single use plastics wherever possible.
The licensing sub-committee also considered that it would be prudent for the applicant to give better particulars of public transport links via its promotional platforms to enable patrons to better plan their journeys to and from the premises.
It considered all the conditions put forward by the EPT and found them to be proportionate. The committee were impressed and satisfied that these conditions had contributed to reducing noise nuisance emanating from the premises.
The committee found the conditions put forward by the licensing unit to be particularly arduous, ill-considered and not specifically relevant to the premises. On that basis, a number of those conditions were not considered proportionate and were subsequently disregarded.
Overall, it took the view, the objections raised could be allayed by imposing the conditions which it did.
The licensing sub-committee formed the view that the revised conditions were proportional, would promote the licensing objectives and allay the concerns put forward by the environmental protection team and the licensing responsible authority whilst allowing the applicant to grow his business.
In reaching this decision, the sub-committee had regard to all the relevant considerations, the public sector equality duty and the four licensing objectives and considered that this decision was appropriate and proportionate.
|
Appeal rights
The applicant may appeal against any decision:
a. To impose conditions on the licence
b. To exclude a licensable activity or refuse to specify a person as premises supervisor.
Any person who made relevant representations in relation to the application who desire to contend that:
a. The licence ought not to be been granted; or
b. That on granting the licence, the licensing authority ought to have imposed different or additional conditions to the licence, or ought to have modified them in a different way
may appeal against the decision.
Any appeal must be made to the Magistrates’ Court for the area in which the premises are situated. Any appeal must be commenced by notice of appeal given by the appellant to the justices’ clerk for the Magistrates’ Court within the period of 21 days beginning with the day on which the appellant was notified by the licensing authority of the decision appealed against.
Supporting documents: