Agenda item

Library Review Consultation

21st Century vision for Libraries

 

What are your views on library provision from a youth perspective, older persons and those with disabilities with regards to access and available resources?

 

·  To receive information about a survey that was conducted recently on the library services in the Camberwell Community Council area.

 

·  To discuss key findings which came out of the consultation and people’s views particularly with regard to Grove Vale and Camberwell Libraries.

 

Minutes:

The Library service review was presented by cabinet member, Councillor Veronica Ward and Pam Usher, Library Services Manager.

 

Councillor Ward mentioned cuts to the services, that 5,000 people responded to the survey and that the public meetings were well attended.  It was noted that officers from the library services and Councillor Ward attended community council meetings in each of the eight areas and the feedback from all was positive.

 

Councillor Ward talked about the new Library in Canada Water and the proposal for

a new Library in Camberwell.  People applauded at the proposal.  Pam Usher said quite a few people completed the survey online with a great deal of positive feedback from young people that use the libraries for their home work and general studies.

 

Details of the survey are given below and the findings of the survey would be complied in a report for the council’s cabinet meeting which took place on 18 October 2011.

 

Feedback from people who were consulted at Camberwell Library

 

Camberwell    Whole Borough

 

88%

Came to borrow books

79%

Came to borrow books

47%

Came to borrow AV materials

42%

Came to borrow AV materials

44%

Came for information

41%

Came for information

35%

Came to email

31%

Came to email

33%

Came to study

31%

Came to study

 

Volunteers

 

45%

Agree with the use of volunteers

32%

Disagree with the use of volunteers

22%

Neither agree nor disagree

48%

Said that they would NOT volunteer

44%

Said that they would volunteer for up to 10 hours per month

 

Charging for the use of PCs

 

39%

Agree that  a charge should be introduced for using PCs

46%

Disagree that a charge should be introduced for using PCs

15%

Neither agree nor disagree

 

Longer opening hours and maintaining library

 

32%

Said that they would keep existing opening hours even if this means fewer libraries

68%

Said they would keep existing libraries even if this means shorter opening hours

 

Savings

 

42%

Reduce the opening hours

40%

Reduce the budget for IT

30%

Reduce the number of smaller libraries

 

 

Feedback from people who were consulted at Grove Vale Library 

 

Grove Vale    Whole Borough

 

83%

Came to borrow books

79%

Came to borrow books

49%

Came to borrow audio visual materials

42%

Came to borrow audio visual materials

38%

Came for information

41%

Came for information

46%

Came to read

55%

Came to read

 

Volunteers

 

35%

Agree with the use of volunteers

40%

Disagree with the use of volunteers

25%

Neither agree nor disagree

69%

Said that they would NOT volunteer

27%

Said that they would volunteer for up to 10 hours per month

 

Charging for the use of PCs

 

41%

Agree that  a charge should be introduced for using PCs

39%

Disagree that a charge should be introduced for using PCs

19%

Neither agree nor disagree

 

Longer opening hours and maintaining library buildings

 

19%

Said that they would keep existing opening hours even if this means fewer libraries

81%

Said they would keep existing libraries even if this means shorter opening hours

 

Savings

 

53%

Reduce the opening hours

37%

Reduce the budget for IT

18%

Reduce the number of smaller libraries

 

After the presentation people asked questions and provided comments on the library review.

 

In response to questions, Pam explained that the council would consider shared space or accommodation for libraries like sharing a building with a local housing office or other type of community space.

 

Councillor Govier commented on the council looking at other means of funding libraries and to look at other local boroughs which offer a free library service similar to the one located in Upper Norwood (Westow Hill, London SE19).

 

If this model were adopted by the council, no libraries would need to close.  Councillor Ward stated that all options would be investigated but that time and working progress on this were limited.  It is not the council’s wish to close any libraries.

 

In response to a question regarding improved access and disabled toilets in libraries, Councillor Ward mentioned the council were trying to improve access for all Southwark libraries like the Canada Water Library, Blue Anchor Library and the Dulwich Library all have disabled access.  The council would continue to engage as widely as possible on these issues especially with regard to disabled toilets, which had been an ongoing issue which has to be addressed further. 

 

It was noted that further information on the library review would be given at a future community council meeting.

 

The chair thanked Councillor Ward and Pam Usher for their presentations.