Agenda and draft minutes

Health and Social Care Scrutiny Commission - Tuesday 19 September 2023 7.00 pm

Venue: 160, Tooley Street, SE1 2QH

Contact: Julie Timbrell, Project Manager (scrutiny) 

Items
No. Item

1.

Apologies

    • Share this item

    To receive any apologies for absence.

    Minutes:

    Apologies were received from Councillor Nick Johnson.

2.

Notification of any items of business which the chair deems urgent

    • Share this item

    In special circumstances, an item of business may be added to an agenda within five clear working days of the meeting.

    Minutes:

    There were none.

3.

Disclosure of Interests and Dispensations

    • Share this item

    Members to declare any interests and dispensations in respect of any item of business to be considered at this meeting.

    Minutes:

    There were none.

4.

Minutes

    • Share this item

    To approve as a correct record the Minutes of the open section of the meeting on 20 July 2023.

    Supporting documents:

    Minutes:

    The minutes of the meeting held on 20 July 2023 were agreed as an accurate record.

     

5.

Review - Access to Toilets : Age UK London Loos

    • Share this item

    John McGeachy, Campaigns Manager, Age UK London will be attending to present.

     

    A document setting out the views of older Londoners on loos, along with recommendations is attached,  as well as three briefing papers devised by Age UK for  local authorities on  developing toilet strategies, community toilet schemes and the role of planning.

     

     

    Supporting documents:

    Minutes:

    The chair drew the commission’s attention to the Age UK London documentation in the main agenda, which sets out the views of older Londoners on loos, as well as three briefing papers devised by Age UK London for local authorities.

     

    She advised that John Miles, Kilburn Older Voices Exchange, has sent his apologies for the following item, a Toilet Manifesto for London, however John McGeachy has kindly agreed to cover this briefly. The Manifesto for London is in the main agenda.

     

    The chair then invited John McGeachy, Campaigns Manager, Age UK London to present.

     

    The Campaigns Manager gave a summary of the reports circulated.

     

    In addition he referred to good practice by London Local Authorities on providing Community Toilet schemes whereby councils work with local businesses to enable community access:

     

    • Lewisham Council have teamed up with Lewisham Local to conduct community engagement with businesses and provide a map. They also award an annual ‘loo of the year’.

     

    • A number of boroughs including Tower Hamlets, Islington, Merton and Richmond are undertaking a review of their toilet provision, including revisiting their Community Toilet schemes.

     

    The Campaigns Manager also gave feedback from the Loos for Southwark, a campaign group of Southwark residents brought together and supported by Age UK London as part of the London Loos campaign. He made the following points:

     

    • Access to toilets should not be based on ability to pay. Toilets should be free.

     

    • Community Toilets work in day but not so much night, and cannot meet the needs of delivery drivers or the nighttime economy.

     

    • There is particularly poor provision around Peckham.

     

    • Following a long campaign planning permission was granted in 2016 for toilets as part of the redevelopment of land around Peckham Rye station. However as yet there is still no toilet.

     

    • The toilets at Sainsbury’s East Dulwich were commended.

     

    • Southwark Park (Pavilion Café by the lake) has good toilets.

     

    • Other parks could benefit from toilets. There are toilets at Belair Park but they may be closing and concern that Belair House venue does not have accessible toilets.

     

     

    • People do not know where toilets are even if they are available. There is a lack of information available to the public about the location of toilets.

     

    • Provision is patchy at best.

     

    • More toilets are needed in shopping areas.

     

    • It can be really stressful finding a loo.

     

    • Some toilets are in a state of disrepair and very uninviting as a result of anti-social behaviour.

     

    • The provision of public toilets should be a statutory duty.

     

    The chair then invited comments and questions from the commission and the following points were made:

     

    • A member agreed with the importance of toilets being free. It was noted that there are costs associated with maintaining toilets such as cleaning.

     

    • Some people will use available pubs and other places - however some people are not confident to use these.

     

    • There are cohort of people with medical conditions who really need hygienic conditions. The Campaigns Manager agreed that cleanliness is a key issue.

     

6.

Review- Access to Toilets: The Toilet Manifesto for London

    • Share this item

    John Miles, Kilburn Older Voices Exchange, will present the Toilet Manifesto for London.

    Supporting documents:

    Minutes:

    John Miles, Kilburn Older Voices Exchange,  sent his apologies as he was unable to attend due to illness.

7.

Healthwatch Southwark: Latin American community engagement

    • Share this item

    Rumanjeet Kallar, Research and Projects Officer, and  Healthwatch Southwark Community Health Ambassador, Patricia Cuenca will present.

    Supporting documents:

    Minutes:

    Rumanjeet Kallar, Research and Projects Officer, and Healthwatch Southwark Community Health Ambassador, Patricia Cuenca presented.

     

    The chair invited questions and comments.

     

     

    ·  The vice chair commended the report .

     

    ·  It was noted that one of the main issues is poor translation particularly as there are a range of  dialects. Misdiagnosis is a problem for older people in particular.

     

    ·  There was a discussion on the best places to provide information, such as  church services , shops , restaurants , bars , pharmacies.

     

8.

Review - Adult Safeguarding: officer report

    • Share this item

    Pauline O’Hare, Director of Adult Social Care, ,and  Director of Commissioning, Genette Laws will present . A briefing is enclosed .

     

     

     

     

    Supporting documents:

    Minutes:

     

    Pauline O’Hare, Director of Adult Social Care, ,and Gennette Law’s , Director of Commissioning presented.

     

    The chair then invited questions and comments and the following points were made:

     

    ·  A member commented that while the paperwork is robust there are still national and local problems and referred to the recent closure of Queens Oak Care Home.

     

    ·  A member commented that the definition of abuse can be very variable with different views in issues such as pressure sores and appropriate intervention, and asked officers’ view on this. Officers said that a person centred approach is encouraged.

     

    ·  Officers were asked about the perception of inconsistent actions regarding investigations, and officers said this could be in part because of the nature of the allegations. For example moving staff to another floor  might be appropriate for some matters whereas or something more serious could be appropriate to suspend.

     

    ·  An increase in avenues to whistle blow and more publicity was discussed as an intervention and if it would be right to have someone such as the Director of Commissioning being the named officer to contact.

     

    ·  Members commented that a cultural of difficult office politics and staff dynamics can lead to false allegations .

     

    ·  Officers were asked if it could it be beneficial to introduce the same system as in children’s' safeguarding - PIPOT (Persons in a position of trust). It was noted that children’s safeguarding seems for more developed and protective.

     

    ·  There was a discussion on a recent allegation of abuse of by a son against a father and that it was necessary to escalated concerns to more police senior officers to get action.

     

    ·  Officers were asked how they monitor complaints and how they are extending awareness with families.

     

    ·  Officers said that investigation of allegations is sometime a tricky balance between different human rights , including the right to  family life and the right to make unwise decisions. An intervention can be about widening networks and there are  frameworks to support Adult Safeguarding.

9.

Review - Access to Medical Appointments: NHS and cabinet response

    • Share this item

     

    Martin Wilkinson, NHS full time chief operating officer for Partnership Southwark , with assistance from Dr Nancy Kuchemann, co-chair for Partnership Southwark, will present the Partnership Southwark Primary Care response to the review

     

    The cabinet response to recommendation 9 is enclosed, to note.  

    Supporting documents:

    Minutes:

    The chair drew members’ attention to the cabinet response to recommendation 9, which was  enclosed with the papers to note.

     

    Martin Wilkinson, NHS full time chief operating officer for Partnership Southwark, with assistance from Dr Nancy Kuchemann, co-chair for Partnership Southwark,  presented the Partnership Southwark Primary Care response to the review.

     

    The chair then invited comments and questions and the following points were made:

     

    ·  The NHS app is useful, however members fed back it was difficult to resolve an error on an address and it was not possible to access an urgent appointment, despite being advised to use the app.  The NHS leads said this is new technology and tools and therefore will  take a while to bed in. They advised giving feedback to the GP surgeries on any problems.  They went on to comment that some practices are encouraging use of ‘Ask My GP’  which is not the same as  the NHS App . Nationally and locally the NHS is trying to encourage use of the NHS app as  the has access to records.

     

    ·  A member commented that she is not flagged up as a carer in the system.  Dr Kuchemann said this is possible so suggested prompting the practice . A member commented that she had attempted to give constructive feedback to her GP surgery but the receptionist was unable to process this .  The NHS lead advised being persistent and using the feedback/ complaints mechanisms.

     

    ·  Members commented it is still very difficult to get mental health support, and also to access timely GP appointments.

     

    ·  The NHS leads were asked about food bank voucher inconsistencies and were told that  there is a network of social prescribing help but the offer can change over time and in different localities .

     

    ·  The NHS leads commented that that the issues discussed this evening are very much aligned with report findings and recommendations, and assured the commission that work has been convened to get this underway. The chair thanked the NHS leads for their positive response to the scrutiny review. She went on to note that  the problems  identified in the review and the discussion tonight signify that the GP service is not always satisfactory , and she  would therefore welcome a follow up discussion on progress in addressing the recommendations and to understand how much improvement was possible.  The NHS full time chief operating officer for Partnership Southwark said he would be happy to do this and also offered to provide more detail on the response to the report, if helpful.

     

     

     

     

     

10.

Review - Care Contributions : cabinet response

11.

Work Programme