Agenda and minutes
- Attendance details
- Agenda frontsheet
PDF 214 KB
- Agenda reports pack
- Appendices PDF 21 MB
- Supplemental Agenda No.1 PDF 715 KB
- Supplemental Agenda No. 2 PDF 1 MB
- Addendum to Item 12: Policy and Resources Strategy: revenue monitoring report outturn 2022-23 PDF 54 KB
- Supplemental Agenda No. 3 PDF 790 KB
- Appendix PDF 356 KB
- Printed minutes
PDF 477 KB
Venue: Rooms GO2A, B and C, 160 Tooley Street, London SE1 2QH
Contact: Paula Thornton and Virginia Wynn-Jones Phone: 020 7525 4395/7055 Email: paula.thornton@southwark.gov.uk; virginia.wynn-jones@southwark.gov.uk
Note: Livestream link (copy and paste into browser): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=udME_Vtg6wI
| No. | Item | |
|---|---|---|
|
Apologies
To receive any apologies for absence. Minutes: All members were present. |
||
|
Notification of any items of Business which the Chair Deems Urgent
In special circumstances, an item of business may be added to an agenda within five clear working days of the meeting. Supporting documents: Minutes: The chair gave notice of the following late items:
Item 11: Policy and Resources Strategy: Capital Monitoring report outturn 2022-23
Item 12: Policy and Resources Strategy: Revenue Monitoring Report Outturn 2022-23 and an addendum report.
Reasons for urgency and lateness will be specified in the relevant minutes. |
||
|
Notice of Intention to conduct business in a closed meeting, and any representations received
To note the items specified which will be considered in a closed meeting. Minutes: No representations were received. |
||
|
Disclosure of Interests and Dispensations
Members to declare any interests and dispensations in respect of any item of business to be considered at this meeting. Minutes: There were none. |
||
|
Announcement - Council homes built in Southwark The leader was pleased to announce the success of council home building in Southwark and expressed his thanks to the cabinet member for council homes, the council housing staff and to local residents/groups who have had a role to play in this success. |
||
|
Minutes
To approve as a correct record the minutes of the open section of the meeting held on 7 March 2023. Supporting documents: Minutes: RESOLVED:
That the minutes of the open section of the meeting held on 7 March 2023 be approved as a correct record and signed by the chair. |
||
|
Public Question Time (15 Minutes)
To receive any questions from members of the public which have been submitted in advance of the meeting in accordance with the cabinet procedure rules. The deadline for the receipt of public questions is midnight Wednesday 7 June 2023. Supporting documents: Minutes: 1. Question from Linda Bird
When will council leader, Councillor Williams take action about the Lime bikes and other rental bikes and scooters which litter our roads and pavements, blocking access and creating dangerous conditions for other road users?”
Response by the Leader and Councillor James McAsh, Cabinet Member for Climate Emergency, Clean Air and Streets
Councillors Kieron Williams and James McAsh responded to the question at the meeting, highlighting the actions being taken by the council, including working closely with Transport for London and writing to the providers of these bicycles in the borough. Additionally, action was set against the need to encourage more environmentally friendly forms of transport and accessible streets for all.
The following public questions were also received:
2. Jane Lyons
Given Sadiq Khan’s recent comments about LTNs, in particular that ‘they are not permanent or fixed in stone’ and that ‘good councils will try to ameliorate any unintended consequences’, is Southwark planning to review the Dulwich LTN and remove it if the known harmful consequences cannot be ameliorated?
3. Lindsay Chathli
Can the new cabinet member for streets please confirm that, going forward, Southwark’s consultations will give residents a genuine opportunity to reject the council's proposals, for instance relating to road closures and CPZs, and will in each case honour the result?
4. Clive Rates
The cabinet member for streets has recently restated Southwark’s target of 100% CPZ coverage by 2024. What is the democratic mandate for this, and what assurances can he give that parking charges will not rise further, or that available parking spaces will not be reduced once CPZs are in place?
5. Alex Hamilton
Given that Southwark’s objectives regarding Turney Road and the Dulwich Village junction were roundly rejected in both the recent consultation and the earlier consultations, how can Southwark justify the continuing closure of the junction at Calton Avenue - Court Lane, even to Blue Badge holders and other vulnerable road users?
6. Tristan Honeyborne
The recent consultation relating to the proposed closure of Turney Road and the Dulwich Village junction demonstrated a clear lack of support for Southwark’s objectives of ?‘safety, community and connection’; why do you think that was, as these seem to be objectives that should attract a lot of support?
7. Jean Cary-Elwes
Why is Southwark Council ignoring residents' concerns and complaints about the dangerous state of the Dulwich Village junction where there are now no safe crossing places where there used to be three, and where cyclists ride through at speed on pavements and pedestrianised area?
8. Charles Cary-Elwes
Southwark Council marketed the Dulwich LTN as being to ‘help tackle the Climate Emergency, reducing carbon emissions from vehicles in Southwark’. When will Southwark Council provide the evidence that the Dulwich LTN has reduced emissions and journey miles in the Dulwich area?
As the questioners were not in attendance, the leader confirmed that arrangements would be made for responses to be sent after the meeting. |
||
|
Deputation Requests
To consider any deputation requests. The deadline for the receipt of a deputation request is midnight Wednesday 7 June 2023. Minutes: None were received. |
||
|
Keeping Education Strong Recommendations
To approve the recommendations of the Keeping Education Strong strategy. Supporting documents: Minutes: Kate Wooder, executive headteacher, Snowsfields and Tower Bridge primary schools and Sarah Beard, executive headteacher of Bessemer Grange were in attendance to provide their comments.
RESOLVED:
1. That the following next steps be agreed:
a. That the council continues to have discussions with the schools, MATs or Diocesan bodies concerned for the following schools about reducing their published admission number (PAN):
i. Bessemer Grange Primary School ii. Goose Green Primary School iii. Grange Primary School iv. Rye Oak Primary School v. St Francis Roman Catholic Primary School vi. St Joseph’s Camberwell Catholic Infants School vii. St Paul’s Church of England Academy.
That it be noted, as regards changes to the published admission number of a school, these can be made by the relevant admission authority. For community schools this is the council. For other schools the council will need to discuss their proposals with the relevant admission authority. Where it is proposed to vary admission arrangements already in place, this will need the agreement of the schools adjudicator after consultation with any relevant school.
b. That the council continues to have discussions with the schools, MATs or Diocesan bodies about proposing a consultation on an amalgamation for the following schools:
i. Harris Academy Free (Academy Free, PA3, Rye Lane) with Harris Primary Academy Peckham Park (Academy, PA3, Peckham)
ii. Comber Grove primary school with another Southwark primary school to be identified.
iii. St Mary Magdalene Church of England primary school with another Southwark primary school to be identified.
c. That it be noted that statutory processes apply to any proposal to alter a maintained school. Where amalgamations are recommended that will include the closure of a maintained school any proposals will be subject to statutory consultation and publication under the Education and Inspections Act 2006, and in accordance with regulations and guidance issued under that Act.
Any decisions to close a maintained school will ultimately need to be made by the cabinet.
Decisions regarding academies will be made by the relevant academy trust in consultation with the Department for Education.
2. That the report and appendices be noted. |
||
|
Closure of Townsend Primary School
To approve the closure of Townsend Primary School. Supporting documents: Minutes: RESOLVED:
That the proposal for the closure of Townsend Primary School from 31 August 2023 be agreed. |
||
|
Sustainable Food Strategy
To note the actions highlighted in the report taken to tackle food insecurity in Southwark and to approve the draft right to food action plan. Supporting documents: Minutes: RESOLVED:
1. That the sustainable food strategy as set out in Appendix 1 of the report be approved.
2. That the actions highlighted in paragraphs 4 to 17 of the report taken to tackle food insecurity in Southwark be noted.
3. That the right to food action plan as set out in Appendix 2 of the report be approved. |
||
|
Policy and Resources Strategy: Capital Monitoring Report Outturn 2022-23
To note the capital outturn position for 2022-23. Supporting documents: Minutes: It was not possible to circulate the report five clear days in advance of the meeting. The chair agreed to accept the item as urgent as the council were required to note the outturn capital position on the general fund and housing revenue account in June in order to provide necessary context to the revenue budget setting process for 2024-25 which will commence formally in July 2023. Estimates of capital expenditure in future years, and therefore potential borrowing requirements, will have an impact on revenue budgets.
RESOLVED:
1. That outturn and resources for 2022-23 and future years for both the general fund and housing investment programmes as detailed in Appendices A, B and D of the report be noted.
2. That the virements and variations to the general fund and housing investment capital programme as detailed in Appendix C of the report and the new capital bid contained within this report and summarised at Appendix E (further information at paragraphs 135 to 137 of the report) be approved.
3. That it be noted the significant funding requirement of £312m which needs to be identified for the general fund programme to be fully delivered over the remaining term of the programme, as detailed in Appendix A of the report.
4. That the borrowing requirement of at least £777m for the committed housing investment programme to be fully delivered over the remaining term of the programme, as detailed in Appendix B of the report be noted.
5. That the need to identify a further £1bn of funding to deliver the un-committed programme over the remaining term of the programme, as detailed in Appendix B of the report be noted.
6. That the significant contribution the capital programme is making towards the objectives of the council’s climate change strategy (see paragraphs. 18-19, 81-83 of the report and throughout departmental narratives) be noted. |
||
|
Policy and Resources Strategy: Revenue Monitoring Report Outturn 2022-23
To note the forecast revenue outturn position for 2022-23. Supporting documents: Minutes: It was not possible to circulate the report five clear days in advance of the meeting. The chair agreed to accept as urgent as the council were required to note the outturn revenue position on the general fund and housing revenue account in June in order to provide necessary context to the budget setting process for 2024-25, which will commence formally in July 2023.
Additionally, an addendum report was circulated and published and contained a correction to Table 2: HRA Outturn 2022-23.
RESOLVED:
1. That the balanced general fund outturn position for 2022-23 after movements in reserves and application of planned contingency funds be noted.
2. That the key adverse variations and budget pressures underlying the outturn position be noted:
(i) The adverse variance of £2m on the DSG budget, bringing the accumulated deficit to £14.5m (net of Safety Valve funding received from Government)
(ii) Pay, energy and contractual inflation across all departments (mitigated through use of contingency and reserves)
(iii) The continuing budget pressures on temporary accommodation.
3. That the utilisation of £4m contingencyto offset adverse variances be noted.
4. That the housing revenue account outturn for 2022-23(Table 2 paragraphs 79-91of the report) which is balanced following a £6.7m draw-down from reserves be noted.
5. That the movements and balances of general fund earmarked reserves as set out in paragraphs 97-106 and Appendix B of the report be noted. 6. That the interdepartmental budget movements that exceed £250k as shown in Appendix A of the report be approved.
7. That the interdepartmental general fund budget movements that are less than £250k as shown in Appendix A of the report be noted. |
||
|
Local Development Order for the Southwark district heating network (connected to SELCHP)
To approve the adoption of the Local Development Order to grant planning approval for the Southwark district heating network (connected to SELCHP) Supporting documents: Minutes: RESOLVED:
1. That it be agreed to make a Local Development Order for the Southwark District Heating Network (Appendices A and B of the report).
2. That the equalities impact analysis which is in Appendix C and consultation report (Appendix D of the report) be noted.
3. That it be noted that the council has made an environmental impact assessment (EIA) screening opinion and has resolved that the Local Development Order does not comprise development, which requires EIA. |
||
|
Gateway 2 - Contract Award Approval: Main contractor for the Sceaux Gardens Estate redevelopment
To approve the award of the main contract for the Sceaux Gardens Estate redevelopment. Supporting documents: Minutes: RESOLVED:
1. That the award of the main contract for the Sceaux Gardens Estate redevelopment, to Wilmott Dixon Construction Ltd procured via the Scape Framework for a period of 160 weeks for a contract value not to exceed £47,001,717be approved, noting this is broken down into two phases, with a break clause, for reasons set out in the financial implications at paragraphs 80-91 of the report:
· Phase 1 delivering 58 new homes at Florian and Racine for a contract sum of £34,840,744 · Phase 2 delivering 21 new homes at the Marie Curie Garage Site for a contract sum not to exceed £12,160,973 .
2. That the delegation to the strategic director of housing to proceed with phase 2 (Marie Curie garages) be approved, not exercising the break clause, for a not to exceed sum of £12,160,973, if instructed by 27 November 2023, or as adjusted in accordance with the agreed uplift business cost information service (BCIS) model if not instructed by that date, subject to there being sufficient budget available and alternative funding in place.
3. That it be noted that this scheme benefits from a £100k per unit grant subsidy from the Greater London Authority (GLA), which results in a total contribution of up to £7.9m for both phases.
4. That it be notes that the strategic director for housing gave approval to utilise the Scape framework for the appointment of Wilmott Dixon Construction for the pre-services agreement (PSA) in August 2022 and demolition / enabling works in February 2023 as set out in paragraph 10 and 11 of the report. |
||
|
Gateway 1 - Procurement Strategy Approval: Electrical Installations Refurbishments and Maintenance Contracts
To approve the procurement strategy to undertake a tender procedure for two electrical installations refurbishment and maintenance contracts. Supporting documents: Minutes: RESOLVED:
1. That the procurement strategy outlined in the report to undertake a tender procedure for two electrical installations refurbishment and maintenance contracts be approved:
· Contract A - Bermondsey, Rotherhithe, Walworth and Borough and Bankside at an estimated annual cost of £4.26m · Contract B – Camberwell, Dulwich, Peckham and Nunhead at an estimated annual cost of £4.06m.
each for a period of five years from October 2024 (at an estimated combined total cost £41.6m) with the option to extend up to a further two years (in increments at the council’s sole discretion subject to performance) making an estimated total contract value for both contracts of £58.24m.
2. That it be noted that the procurement strategy in the report will result in bidders being required to bid as backup to each other on their tendered rates to ensure an efficient service delivery.
3. That the development of an in-house option as detailed in paragraphs 29, 70 and 84 of the report be noted.
4. That authority be delegated to the strategic director of housing in consultation with the cabinet member to approve the gateway 2 report for the two electrical installations refurbishment and maintenance contracts for the reasons detailed in paragraph 42 of the report. |
||
|
Report of the Health and Social Care Scrutiny - Care Contributions
To consider recommendations from the health and social care scrutiny commission in respect of care contributions. Supporting documents: Minutes: RESOLVED:
1. That the recommendations of the health and social care scrutiny commission: care contributions scrutiny review report, Appendix A, as set out on page 3 of the report be noted.
2. That the recommendations from the commission be considered and that the relevant cabinet member reports to cabinet on the recommendations, as set out in the report.
3. That it be noted that overview and scrutiny procedure rule 15.3 requires cabinet to consider and provide a written response to the report within two months.
4. That it be noted that it is for cabinet to decide whether or not to accept the scrutiny commission’s recommendation. |
||
|
Report of the Health and Social Care Scrutiny Commission - Access to medical appointments
To consider recommendations from the health and social care scrutiny commission in respect of access to medical appointments. Supporting documents: Minutes: RESOLVED:
1. That the recommendations of the health and social care scrutiny commission: access to medical appointments scrutiny review report, Appendix A of the report, as set out on page 3 – 6 of the report be noted.
2. That the recommendations from the commission be considered and that the relevant cabinet member reports back to cabinet on the relevant recommendation, as set out in the report.
3. That it be noted that overview and scrutiny procedure rule 15.3 requires cabinet to consider and provide a written response to the report within two months. |
||
|
Report of the Environment and Community Engagement Scrutiny Commission - Resident participation framework
To consider recommendations from the environment and community engagement scrutiny commission in respect of the resident participation framework. Supporting documents: Minutes: Councillor Margy Newens, chair of the environment and community engagement scrutiny commission presented the report to cabinet.
RESOLVED:
1. That the recommendations of the environment and community engagement scrutiny commission: resident participation framework mini scrutiny review report, Appendix A, as set out on pages 6 - 8 of the report be noted.
2. That the recommendations from the commission be considered and that the relevant cabinet member reports back to cabinet on the recommendations.
3. That it be noted that overview and scrutiny procedure rule 15.3 requires cabinet to consider and provide a written response to the report within two months.
4. That it be noted that it is for cabinet to decide whether or not to accept the scrutiny commission’s recommendation. |
||
|
Report of the Environment and Community Engagement Scrutiny Commission - Financing Southwark's Green Transition Scrutiny Review Report
To consider recommendations from the environment and community engagement scrutiny commission in respect of financing Southwark’s green transition. Supporting documents: Minutes: Councillor Margy Newens, chair of the environment and community engagement scrutiny commission presented the report to cabinet.
RESOLVED:
1. That the recommendations of the environment and community engagement scrutiny commission: climate finance – financing Southwark’s green transition scrutiny review report, Appendix A, as set out on pages 10 -13 of the report be noted.
2. That recommendations from the commission be considered and that the relevant cabinet member reports back to cabinet on the recommendations.
3. That it be noted that overview and scrutiny procedure rule 15.3 requires cabinet to consider and provide a written response to the report within two months.
4. That it be noted that it is for cabinet to decide whether or not to accept the scrutiny commission’s recommendation. |
||
|
Report of the Housing and Community Safety Scrutiny Commission: Housing Repairs Service, Council Leaseholders and Empty Homes
To consider recommendations from the housing and community safety scrutiny commission in respect of housing repairs services, council leaseholders and empty homes. Supporting documents: Minutes: RESOLVED:
1. That the recommendations from the housing and community safety scrutiny commission arising from the scrutiny review of housing repairs service, council leaseholders and empty homes in the Borough of Southwark, paragraphs 6 to 15 of the report be noted.
2. That that the relevant cabinet member reports back to cabinet on the recommendations within two months. |
||
|
Report of the Housing and Community Safety Scrutiny Commission: Violence Against Women and Girls (VAWG), Hate Crime and Domestic Abuse
To consider recommendations from the housing and community safety scrutiny commission in respect of violence against women and girls, hate crime and domestic abuse. Supporting documents: Minutes: RESOLVED:
1. That cabinet note the recommendations from the housing and community safety scrutiny commission arising from the scrutiny review violence against women and girls, hate crime and domestic abuse, paragraphs 6 to 8 of the report.
2. That that the relevant cabinet member reports back to cabinet on the recommendations within two months. |
||
|
Report of the Education and Local Economy Scrutiny Commission: Review of mitigating falling pupil numbers in schools
To consider recommendations from the education and local economy scrutiny commission in respect of mitigating falling pupil numbers in schools. Supporting documents: Minutes: RESOLVED:
1. That the recommendations from the education and local economy scrutiny commission arising from the scrutiny review mitigating falling pupil numbers in schools in the London Borough of Southwark, paragraphs 14 to 21 of the report be noted.
2. That the recommendations from the education and local economy scrutiny commission be considered and that the relevant cabinet member reports back to cabinet within two months. |
||
|
Report of the Education and Local Economy Scrutiny Commission - Scrutiny Review of the cost of living crisis on businesses
To consider recommendations from the education and local economy scrutiny commission in respect of the cost of living crisis on businesses. Supporting documents: Minutes: RESOLVED:
1. That the recommendations from the education and local economy scrutiny commission arising from the scrutiny review Impact of the cost-of-living crisis on businesses in the London Borough of Southwark, paragraphs 12 to 22 of the report be noted.
2. That the recommendations from the education and local economy scrutiny commission be considered and that the relevant cabinet member reports back to cabinet within two months. |
||
|
Motions Referred from Council Assembly 22 March 2023
To consider the following council motions referred from council assembly 22 March 2023:
· Safer Southwark Communities · Tackling second homes with council tax premiums · This council commits to being a diverse council · One year on, Southwark stands with Ukraine · RSPCA: pets as prizes · Southwark green finance. Supporting documents: Minutes: RESOLVED:
Safer Southwark Communities
That the motion referred from council assembly as a recommendation to cabinet, set out below be agreed.
1. This council notes:
a. That Southwark Council thanks Baroness Casey for her independent review into the standards of behaviour and internal culture of the Metropolitan Police Service (‘the Met’).
b. Southwark residents and all Londoners expect and deserve a police service they can trust, not fear, which responds to the needs of the communities it serves and is accountable to the community for the decisions it makes. The fundamental principle of policing by consent requires the Met to both earn and maintain this public trust in everything it does.
c. We are therefore appalled by the findings of the review, including the finding of institutional racism, sexism, misogyny and homophobia in the Met and the failure to implement much needed operational, cultural and systemic change, despite numerous opportunities to do so over several decades.
d. Our community have been let down by a longstanding failure within the Met to fully accept that policing can also attract predators and bullies. The Met needs to be alive to this very serious risk. It needs to keep them out when they try to get in, to root them out where they exist, and to guard against the corrosive effects that their actions have on trust, confidence and the fundamental Peelian principles of policing by consent.
e. We are deeply concerned that our residents’ trust and confidence in the Met has fallen even more than in other areas of London. Trust and confidence in the Met fell by 10% in Southwark in the last year alone. Less than half of Southwark residents feel the Met is doing a “good job”. Our borough had the lowest number of residents in London who felt well informed about the activity of their local police. People from Black and mixed ethnic groups have the lowest trust and confidence in the Met of all racial groups.
f. We welcome the fact that the new Met Commissioner has committed to major reform of the Met and to rebuild Londoners’ confidence in their Police Service.
g. However to rebuild trust and confidence in the police the Metropolitan Police Service must go further and must follow the full recommendations of the Casey report and work with our communities and the council in a genuine and meaningful way to deliver them.
h. Southwark Council has written to Sir Mark Rowley, to seek a joint meeting with our basic command unit (BCU) partners, Lambeth Council, to discuss how these vital changes can best be taken forward in our two boroughs.
i. The failures highlighted in the Casey review are overwhelmingly due to a longstanding failure of culture within the force. However, the review also highlights that government cuts to funding for the Met have exacerbated some problems, putting children and women in particular at greater risk and leading to a situation where London no longer has a functioning neighbourhood policing service. ... view the full minutes text for item 24. |
||
|
Nominations to Panels, Forums and Boards for 2023-24
To approve nominations to panels, boards and forums for 2023-24. Supporting documents: Minutes: RESOLVED:
That the allocation of places to panels, boards and forums set out in Appendix A of the report be agreed as follows:
Joint Partnership Panel (Trade Union consultation)
Cllr Kieron Williams Cllr Stephanie Cryan
Homeowners Service Charge Arbitration Tribunal
Cllr Charlie Smith Cllr Renata Hamvas Cllr Sunny Lambe Cllr Sandra Rhule Cllr Margy Newens Cllr Kath Whittam Cllr Sabina Emmanuel Cllr Suzanne Abachor Cllr Maria Linforth-Hall Cllr Jane Salmon
Tenancy and Leaseholder Arbitration Tribunal
Cllr Charlie Smith Cllr Renata Hamvas Cllr Sunny Lambe Cllr Sandra Rhule Cllr Margy Newens Cllr Kath Whittam Cllr Sabina Emmanuel Cllr Suzanne Abachor Cllr Maria Linforth-Hall Cllr Jane Salmon
Southwark Safeguarding Adults Board
Cllr Evelyn Akoto Cllr Dora Dixon-Fyle MBE
Southwark Safeguarding Children’s Board
Cllr Jasmine Ali
Standing Advisory Council on Religious Education
Cllr Laura Johnson Cllr Maggie Browning Cllr Margy Newens Cllr Graham Neale
Southwark Tenant Management Organisation Committee
Cllr Darren Merrill (cabinet member) Cllr Barrie Hargrove Cllr Esme Hicks Cllr Jane Salmon |
||
|
Appointments to Outside Bodies for 2023-24
To approve nomination to outside bodies for 2023-24. Supporting documents: Minutes: RESOLVED:
That appointments to the outside bodies listed in Appendix A of the report for the 2023-24 municipal year be agreed as follows:
Better Bankside Board
Councillor Helen Dennis
Blue Bermondsey BID Board
Cllr Martin Seaton
Board of Southwark College Corporation
Cllr Martin Seaton
Browning Estate Management Association
Cllr Martin Seaton
Canada Water Consultative Forum
Cllr Helen Dennis Cllr Kath Whittam Cllr Bethan Roberts Cllr Jane Salmon
Capital Letters (Boroughs’ Representative Body (BRB)
Cllr Darren Merrill
Central London Forward
Cllr Kieron Williams
Centre London Forward (Employment and Skills Board)
Cllr Martin Seaton
Centre for Literacy in Primary Education
Cllr Jasmine Ali
Cross River Board
Cllr Helen Dennis
Crystal Palace Community Development Trust
Cllr Catherine Rose
Greencoats Studios (UAL, Wilson Road Steering Group)
Cllr Sabina Emmanuel Cllr Natasha Ennin
Groundwork London, Local Authority Strategic Input Authority
Cllr Catherine Rose
Guys and St Thomas NHS Foundation (Council of Governors)
Cllr Emily Hickson
Kings College Hospital NHS (Council of Governors)
Cllr Renata Hamvas
London Bridge Improvement District BID
Cllr Martin Seaton
London Road Safety Council (LRSC)
Cllr James McAsh Cllr Richard Livingstone
London Youth Games Limited
Cllr Catherine Rose Cllr Jasmine Ali (deputy)
Millwall for All
Cllr Sunny Lambe
Mountview
Cllr Portia Mwangangye
NewableLimited (formerly Greater London Enterprise Limited)
Cllr Martin Seaton
North Southwark Environment Trust
Cllr Naima Ali
Oru Space (20 – 22 Lordship Lane) Steering Group
Cllr James McAsh Cllr Charlie Smith
Peckham Levels Steering Group
Cllr Reggie Popoola Cllr Chloe Tomlinson
Peckham Palms Steering Group
Cllr Sabina Emmanuel
Potters Fields Park Management Trust
Cllr Martin Seaton Caroline Bruce, strategic director, environment, neighbourhoods and growth
Plastic Free East Dulwich
Cllr Charlie Smith
Shared ICT Services Joint Committee
Cllr Stephanie Cryan Cllr Dora Dixon-Fyle MBE
South Bank and Waterloo Partnership (previously South Bank Partnership)
South Bank Business Improvement District Ltd
Cllr Martin Seaton Cllr Irina Von Wiese
South Bermondsey Big Local Partnership Steering Group
Cllr Richard Livingstone Cllr Sunny Lambe
South London Gallery Trustee Limited
Cllr Richard Leeming Cllr Reggie Popoola Cllr Cleo Soanes
South London and Maudsley (SLaM) NHS Trust Members Council
Cllr Suzanne Abachor
Southwark and Lambeth Archaeological Excavation Committee (SLAEC)
Cllr Richard Leeming Mr Bob Skelly (deputy)
Southwark Construction Skills Centre (“the Centre”)
Cllr Martin Seaton
Safer Neighbourhood Board (Southwark)
Cllr Dora Dixon-Fyle MBE
WeAreWaterloo BID (Business Improvement District)
Cllr Victor Chamberlain
Walworth Group
Cllr Natasha Ennin |
||
|
Exclusion of the Press and Public That the press and public be excluded from the meeting for the following items of business on the grounds that they involve the likely disclosure of exempt information as defined in category 3 of paragraph 10.4 of the access to information procedure rules of the Southwark Constitution.
The following is a summary of the decisions taken in the closed part of the meeting. |
||
|
Minutes
To approve as a correct record the closed minutes of the meeting held on 7 March 2023. Minutes: RESOLVED:
That the minutes of the closed section of the meeting be approved as a correct record and signed by the chair. |
||
|
Gateway 2 - Contract Award Approval: Main contractor for the Sceaux Gardens Estate redevelopment Minutes: The cabinet considered the closed information relating to this item. Please see item 14 for the decision. |